Headlines perform many functions. One such is to draw the reader into the text that follows. Thus a headline must entice, and not repel.
Sometimes, a headline must report bad news. This frequently happens in newspapers and other topical publications. The key here is sensitivity.
I don’t think this headline (from today’s edition of the UK Daily Telegraph) somehow grasped that point. Just in case the link is subsequently updated, here is the text of the headline:
Isil destroys Roman-era columns in Palmyra during execution.
In reading this headline, it struck me that the greater emphasis had been placed on the destruction of the Roman-era columns. Special as these Roman columns are, I would have thought that the emphasis should have been placed instead on the killing of the captives. The headline somehow gives the impression that the destruction of the columns is a more tragic and newsworthy matter than the execution of the captives.
I suppose a counter-argument would run that, by now, we should be so inured to these acts of violence that they are no longer to be regarded as shocking news. And that, rather, the news element lies elsewhere – in this case, in the destruction of the Roman columns. However, this is not an argument that I would support. We should never sacrifice the element of sensitivity. It is very important for the relationship between the writer and the reader, and, more important, it comes down to basic humanity.